Tomorrow evening, “Racism is Murder” will be the call. Moviment Graffitti and eleven other groups, NGOs and parties are taking part in a rally against violence and racism. So far so good. I was urged to take part and I would have, but I won’t, for reasons I detail below.
The trigger for this rally is the death of a man called Suleiman Abubaker, caused, to whatever extent, by a bouncer Duncan Deguara.
My own first reaction to this case, given my own experience is that it is a bouncer-related problem, that this was a case of bouncers who itch to try out their punches, that they are mostly hired thugs who aren’t even licensed as security people, and have less an attitude to keep the peace than an attitude to appear tough and macho and bully people around. This is a general view rather than a judgement about Deguara himself, especially since the Courts are still investigating the case, and from reports and claims, it appears that the case was rather more complex.
Let’s make one thing clear though: tomorrow’s rally is not about violence. There were many opportunities to hold such a rally when other cases occurred in the past few months. The main feature of this case for leftist liberals is that the man who died was black. Why do I say leftist? The twelve groups taking place tomorrow are an indication of who will be taking part: Alternattiva Demokratika, Forum Żagħżagħ Laburisti, Forum for Justice and Cooperation, General Workers’ Union, Jesuit Refugee Service (Malta), Inizjamed, Kopin, Koperattiva Kummerc Gust, Migrants’ Solidarity Movement, Third World Group and Żminijietna. It could have been a national issue and a national rally but tomorrow it will not be. Apart from the fact that these eleven groups are barely fronted by ten individuals as active members, practically all these groups sport leftist ideologies. Even if this weren’t evident from their manifestos, despite the neutral-sounding names, it is evident from the way they toed the line behind Moviment Graffitti’s and the leftist media’s gross assumption that this was a racist attack.
Let’s look at the features of this tragic incident that seem to weigh against it being a racist attack.
1. Suleiman Abubaker had a history of rowdiness and of conflicts with police and bouncers. This is not to justify but to reason. I would argue that someone with a history of conflicts with police and bouncers significantly raises his chances of getting pulped at some point in time. And partially for reasons I mentioned earlier on about bouncers and so forth.
2. Despite the fact that many opinionists on the left opined that Abubaker was refused entry for being black, the claim from the bouncer was that Abubaker was refused entry because he was drunk and rowdy. Deguara further claimed that he escorted Abubaker three times peacefully to the door. This last claim in particular can be verified or discredited when the CCTVs are checked, and by witnesses in the area, and is a crucial claim. If Deguara had premeditated murder because of Abubaker’s race, why would he have escorted the man three times to the exit?
3. The third time is when the incident happened. First story I obtained was that Abubaker was punched in the face and died of the injury. Does this seem like an intended murder to anyone? The bouncer knew that with one punch he was going to kill a man? If this version were true, it would be obvious at face value that the punch had “gone wrong” and that Abubaker’s death were accidental. Deguara however claimed further that it was Suleiman Abubaker who first hit Deguara with a bottle and that Deguara pushed him away and Abubaker fell. He then stood up, fell again and stood again and walked away with the aid of his friends. This is what Deguara claimed.
4. Three other Maltese seem to have contradicted Abubaker’s French companions’ claim that a third person kicked Abubaker while lying on the ground.
Purely at face value, and before the Courts have concluded the case, I would conclude nothing about the case if not that it weighs heavily against the idea that this was a racist attack. If racism contributed at all in this death it seems to be very obscure. For the great majority of journalists, the simple fact that Abubaker was black closed the case. The left, both in its guise as the opinionist media and as NGOs, has simply hijacked a tragic death as a crusade against racism and violence. Every leftist is suddenly certain that this was a racist attack, simply because according to their logic, an attack on a black man must be fueled by racism. And it seems it took the death of a black man to mobilize them against violence. All this from the supposedly colour-blind folk.
When confronted with these facts, most leftists start to generalize that regardless of this specific case, the rally is against violence and racism. Still, it was this case that triggered it, a case that basically has nothing to do with racism and if Deguara’s claims are true, very little with violence. Further I’ll bet my shoelaces that the rally will take a form that supersedes anti-racism. For example, I’ll bet another pair of shoelaces that there will be banners saying “ONE WORLD. NO BORDERS” which is strictly not an anti-racist issue. I was asked to participate in this rally, but both by looking at the list of groups involved and by knowing what they support and will support during this rally, I will be made to say more than condemn violence and racism.
Moviment Graffitti are doing nothing but building their case, during what they think is an opportune time, from a case that has absolutely nothing, or dubious little, relevant to what they want to build and say. This is naught but more minority hero worship from the radical left, in this case an inverse Mumia Abu-Jamal. Abu-Jamal was made a hero for murdering a cop. Suleiman Abubaker is becoming a hero very possibly for being slain accidentally.
The battle is set for June 6th. The battle field: The Sacred Island of Melita. The outcome: The destiny of a whole People.
Should the traitors and their political puppets win: Malta as we know it – as our ancestors have known it from time immemorial – would be lost. It would become a hell-hole: a Haiti.
A Sacred Island overrun by Black primitives. A once proud people cowed into second class citizens: their children reduced to slaves.
A whole history lost, deleted – a civilization gone. An irredeemable genetic disaster. A sin against Nature.
We have to emerge Victorious. For if we lose, then everything before and ahead, is lost too. We must keep the flame alight.
Win we must – for there is no other way. Win we will! – With our Imperium Europa banner aloft. Win! – and we shall place our beloved Malta at the apex of Europe.
The following was written by a former PN supporter and is reproduced here with permission
Hbieb
Bhalma tafu jien mhux soltu nikteb fit-tul. Hudu ftit pacenzja bija…illum eccezzjoni.
Nixtieq nindirizza lil kulhadd imma specjalment lin-Nazzjonalisti. Nazzjonalista tkun meta tahdem ghall-gid kollettiv tan-Nazzjon. Mhux ta’ dawk li jpappuha minn fuq dahar min jahdem. Li hobz il-biezel jieklu l-ghazzien mhux principju Nazzjonalist, imma ta’ GonziPN.
Il-mexxejja Nazzjonalisti dejjem kienu nies li jghozzu l-Kultura. Illum ghandna Kap tal-PN li jghidilna li ghandna bizzejjed teatri, u ghaldaqstant irid jibni parlament minflok it-Teatru l-Imwaqqa’. Naf li l-paraguni huma odjuzi, imma ma nistax ma nfakkarkomx li dan it-tali qed jilbes iz-zarbun li darba kien ta’ Nerik Mizzi, bniedem ikkulturat minn guf ommu. Jekk dan hux sagrilegg m’inix fil-grad li niddeciedi.
Il-mexxejja Nazzjonalisti ma ddejqux jopponu lil Hadd. Gorg Borg Olivier min jaf kemm kiser ghajn l-Ingilterra meta ried l-Indipendenza. Nerik Mizzi anke daq l-ezilju. Sahansitra certi socjalisti marru f’dan l-estrem bhal Agatha Barbara u Bertu Hyzler, anke jekk ma naqbilx maghhom.
Int li bhali thobb dik il-bandiera glorjuza (il-Maduma) staqsi lilek innifsek…..il-mexxejja tal-lum lesti jmorru l-habs ghall-ideal? Qabel xejn, ghandhom ideal? Ghadu jidwi f’widnejja l-kliem ta’ Joe Saliba li llum l-ideologiji spiccaw! Spiccaw sabih. Araw is-socjalisti kif iddominaw bl-ideologija ta’ hobz il-biezel jieklu l-ghazzien! Mhux talli hekk, talli nfiltraw lill-PN u dan qed imexxi l-politika taghhom!
L-ahhar li ltqajna l-Gharghur kien hemm persuna li staqsieni “min hu lest li jmur il-Habs ghalik ?” Insellimlu minn hawn, ghax dik il-mistoqsija ispiratni biex nikteb dan kollu.
Illum il-Gurnata hu NORMAN LOWELL biss li kapaci jibqa’ sod sal-punt li jissogra l-habs. Tghid ghandu bzonn dan l-inkwiet kollu Norman? Nahseb kien ikun iktar komdu bil-pinzell u l-palette, jew b’xi ktieb f’idejh u jhalli l-bahar ihabbat. Imma min ghandu sens ta’ ideal u Amor Proprju ma jhallix il-bahar ihabbat!
Il-mexxejja Nazzjonalisti dejjem hadmu ghall-Patria. Ugo Mifsud halla hajtu fil-parlament jikkumbatti lit-tradituri stricklandjani. Borg Olivier wahdu ivvota kontra d-deportazzjoni tal-Maltin lejn l-Uganda. U llum x’hemm fil-PN? Rapprezentanti li jsostnu li l-Frontex kienet success, meta min hareg bl-idea nnifsu ammetta li falliet! U kien hemm min sahansitra qal li qed jisthi mill-poplu Malti ghan-nuqqas li wriet lejna l-ewropa. U fl-istess nifs issib xi pupazz li jghidlek li l-problemi ta’ Malta qeghdin fuq l-agenda tal-UE!
Issa qed tinduna habib x’inhi d-differenza bejn Nazzjonalist ta’ vera u supporter ta’ GonziPN?
U lil-dawk li minghalihom li l-problemi ta’ dan il-pajjiz huma l-kontijiet tad-dawl u l-ilma nghidilhom biex jahslu wicchom u jistenbhu. Nighidilhom li wahda mill-akbar problemi hi li l-pajjiz ghandu lilhom bhala oppozizzjoni mnejka. Li kif tahtaf il-poter thallina bl-istess problemi.
Ghalekk nahseb li min ghandu farka gieh, triq wahda ghandu. Uruli ghadna poplu likapaci jiddefendi dak li hu tieghu. Ghidu LE ghall-politika tal-islogans u c-cucati. Aghtu fiducja lil min issogra l-habs ghall-futur taghna. Mhux lil min lest jitfa’ l-habs lil min jiftah halqu.
Tiftakru meta wara seduta tal-Qorti kien hemm carlatana li marret biex tahbat ghal-Eddie Fenech Adami, allura Primministru? Kien pront hafrilha u ma halliex lill-Pulizija jipprocedu. Ara meta Lowell ghadda kumment dwar il-President (l-istess persuna),…eeeeeee …hemmhekk komplew il-proceduri…u kif!
Dan bhal meta kien hemm min jhedded bl-infern……id-dnubiet kollha jinhafru…imma jekk tivvota Labour(dak iz-zmien) ma jinhafirx. Minn hawn insellem il-memorja ta’ dawk il 51000 li sfidaw liz-ziju! Anke jekk politikament ma naqblux…imma l-irgulija hekk titlob.
Illum nistghu naghmlu l-istorja. Billi nisfidaw lin-neputijiet!
Naghlaq billi nsellem lil dawk kollha li taw u qed jaghtu l-ghajnuna lil dan il-Bniedem ta’ kuragg u fibra li llum ma ssibx hafna bhalhom. Grazzi lil Arlette, Dr. emy Bezzina, u lil kull min jemmen u jiddefendi il-liberta ta’ l-espressjoni.
U nappellalek habib……Kun Nazzjonalist ta’ vera. Ichad lil min kasbar l-ideal Nazzjonalista.
Afda f’min jissogra l-liberta’ tieghu biex jiggarantixxi tieghek!
LOWELL!
Malta taghna, met’inti tridna Demmna incarcru ghal-Liberta’ Lesti ghal-Kollox met’int tghajtilna Ruh wahda l-ghaqda minn taghna tkun!
Minn “ Sbejha Patria” Innu tal- Partit Nazzjonalista.
We are placing this video together with this article for a reason.
In the video, Norman Lowell addresses the people of Malta for the coming EU elections and highlights the most important issue of the day: Immigration. The article has been written by a South African of European origin and shows his support for Lowell and Imperium Europa even though he lives thousands of miles away.
If you can't see the video above then please visit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TgT7oyM550
Hello to all the friends and supporters of Norman Lowell! I'm writing this message to you from South Africa, where I've lived for most of my 30 years. Some of you may wonder how a white South African (of which there are still a few left!) came to follow Mr. Lowell's struggle from halfway across the world.
Quite simply, I heard an interview with Mr. Lowell on Majority Rights, a site addressing the most pressing issues of all Western civilization. I thought Mr. Lowell, or "Lowell" as he asked to be addressed, an engaging speaker. He presented an uncompromisingly truthful message in a sincere and cultured manner. What a contrast to the average politician, whose message is painfully shrill when it isn't entirely fabricated! Lowell, I realised, is a man with the passion and ability to do the European cause justice.
Now, as an "African" by location if not birth, why should the European cause concern me? Well, for the simple reason that I aspire to leave South Africa for The West! All that once made this land at the tip of Africa inhabitable is now vanishing, and so I wish to return to my ancestral roots in Europe. I would have long since returned to Great Britain were it not for the endless taxes, regulations, and cameras. Life in Africa accustoms one to anarchy, and I can more easily defend against murderous savages than tolerate the meddling of self-serving bureaucrats.
Fortunately, many Europeans feel this same disgust towards their "elites;" those grubby little Neros who’d see Europe’s proud cities burn. While I’d advise Europeans against “escaping” to the anarchy of Africa (or even worse, importing the anarchy of Africa to Europe!), it’s my hope that liberty will come to define Europe in the years ahead. More precisely, I can think of nothing better for Europe than a future paved with free market economics and a healthy nationalism. To that end, I’d like to offer what support I can muster to groups like Viva Malta and the British National Party, who fight for the rights of Europe’s natural inhabitants. Certainly, if such rights are not enforced once and for all, I might as well stay in Africa or move to Arabia!
And what a tragedy it would be if Europe came to resemble the squalor and misery of such places. How sad for the world if the Western civilization which so blessed the world with invention and prosperity were to succumb to barbarism. As no sane European man, women or child could wish such a fate upon themselves, the blame for the demographic threat to Europe falls entirely on her feeble leaders! An end to the misrule of those bloated, boy-loving bureaucrats! An end to those who rob Europe of her wealth through legalised plunder and, worse, rob Europe of her territory through legalised invasion.
As vigorous opposition to this last evil of replacement-immigration forms (to the best of my knowledge) the basis of Mr. Lowell's campaign, I'd like to offer a few words on the dubious wisdom of adding thousands upon thousands of Africans to the beautiful Isle of Malta. Firstly, it's hardly necessary to dislike Africans - or have the least feeling towards them whatsoever - to recognise the folly of absorbing an endless tide of them into a small island nation. The dangers of overpopulation alone argue against such a self-destructive course.
Secondly, an influx of even the most highly-skilled and law-abiding immigrants represents a palpable loss to the Maltese people. In economic terms - despite the insulting fiction that "they do the jobs you won't" - the fact remains that a large chunk of any immigrant's earnings leak back to that country in which the immigrant belongs. Instead of being spent on Maltese goods and services, this money is lost forever, like so many charitable donations down the African rat-hole.
As for those immigrants who fail to find work - a likely prospect in this time of financial contraction - and to say nothing of those free-riding parasites who refuse to work, such types are an obvious drain on Malta’s economy. How is it those who’ve never contributed to the national treasury claim the right to draw from it? It is sheer injustice that such moochers and their multiplying dependents, should leech off your nation while contributing nothing but sullen ingratitude!
Though the negative economic impact of immigration deserves to be studied in depth - as I'm sure your blundering bureaucrats have, like so many others, utterly failed to do - third comes the most critical problem; the political. By what right are these people entering your lands, changing your culture, and demanding your tax money? Unless the majority of Maltese have voted for such an imposition, it is surely illegitimate! How is it such a dangerous and destabilising social experiment is conducted without your consent? Has the suggestion of a referendum on the issue ever been raised?
I say any State which allows - even promotes - such a disgraceful state of affairs has failed in its primary duty and reason for being; the protection of the natural interests of its citizens.
So, are such States simply incompetent, or are they actively treasonous to their own people? I certainly don't know enough about the government of Malta to comment, though it seems to me the Maltese must demand better governance either way!
If not, Malta puts its wellbeing and the future of its children at the greatest of risk. Allowing hordes of aliens within the national borders is a sure-fire way to permanently alter a nation's face and culture. As so many immigrants exploit the Welfare State to do nothing but breed in idle luxury, every subsequent generation sees less Maltese working harder, to support more immigrants! Eventually, you may find yourselves an exploited minority within your own country. That may sound extreme, but it's exactly what happened in (what was once) my country, South Africa!
Now, I discovered with great interest than Mr. Lowell continues to visit South Africa, and spent time in the former Rhodesia. I believe he even credits his awakening to the realities of racial difference to his time in Rhodesia? While an awareness of self-evident facts may not sound like much, in this age of ever-present multicultural propaganda, it is proof positive of a clear mind! And that Mr. Lowell cleaves to such facts, against all the bullying and trickery of an establishment deeply vested in egalitarian falsehoods, well that speaks loudly of his character.
On the subject of South Africa, I must wonder how many of Mr. Lowell's immigrationist opponents have ever visited this country, or any such Third World pesthole? I believe even a short visit to the shattered inner-cities and sprawling townships of Johannesburg would reverse the positions of all but the most delusional multi-cultists.
Indeed, travel abroad soon reveals to the perceptive mind that linkage between a nation's citizens and its overall state. The disciplined Asians build orderly Asian countries, the inventive European builds advanced European countries, etc. - and what little I've learned of Malta serves as testament to the pride and independence of the Maltese. So then, if you allow North Africans into Malta, you can expect Malta to become more like North Africa. I fail to see how that benefits anyone but those Africans looking to improve their lives and taking the easy way out: sponging off Europeans rather than fixing their own countries. And nowhere is the obvious truth of that people are responsible for their own countries more apparent than in the formerly white-ruled nations of Rhodesia and South Africa.
Under the stewardship of Europeans, Rhodesia was renowned as “the breadbasket of Africa.” I'm sure Mr. Lowell, or anyone else who visited Rhodesia in its heyday, could attest to its former prosperity and orderliness. Now under that despicable Marxist, Robert "Mad Bob" Mugabe, Zimbabwe is a hellish dustbowl.
Once smiling, gainfully-employed Africans have become pitiful wretches, dying in their droves of starvation, cholera and, yes, State persecution. The tipping point came when Mad Bob seized the productive land of white farmers and gave it to his "military veterans" to transform into goat-ravaged desolation, and the country along with it. It's no exaggeration that the descriptions of the depth to which Zimbabwe has sunk would sicken even the most hardened individual. One recent report out of Harare, for instance, describes how fishermen upon Lake Victoria are using the corpses of the recently deceased for bait.
And South Africa, it pains me to say, is going the same way. Once a thriving, productive nation whose standards (industrial, agricultural, scientific, educational, medical and so on, ad nauseam) met or exceeded those of prominent first world nations, South Africa is now a country in rapid decline. The clearest evidence of its debased condition is in the election of former goatherd, Jacob Zuma. A man facing over 700 charges of fraud and corruption prior to his election, a cavorting buffoon who, by his own admittance, endangered his five or six (and counting) wives by sleeping with an AIDS patient. “Sleeping with” rather than “raping” because the courts, whom Zuma so casually intimidates with his chanting, stomping mobs, acquitted him of rape charges. And because, according to Zuma, he's incapable of rape as such a concept does not exist within his culture… If you’ll permit me to describe one last outrage against decency and sense, Jacob Zuma told the court he showered after the “incident,” and so had little chance of contracting the AIDS virus. This from the head of the National AIDS Council, no less.
Forgive me for venturing into such sordid details, but it’s important that the uncensored reality of the African way of life be conveyed. Life here is harsh, primitive and brutal, and it is that way only because Africans are unwilling or incapable to make it any better. The lesson is that one does not improve a country by adding thousands of Third World Africans to it. And, should you ever be tempted to allow African immigrants to gain a decisive political voice in Malta, be warned that they tend to raise strongmen of the likes of Zuma, Mugabe, and worse.
Obvious to all but those blinded ideologues of globalism and its Procrustean levelling, is that Africans are plainly unsuited to Western civilization. Not only Africa but around the world, their presence results in a standard of living which plumbs the depths of any indicator you might care to mention. For those who think Malta can survive their depredations, one need only point to the American states in which Africans have gained majority. Such areas quickly become unfit for European occupation, and even the most liberal of European Americans soon moves on to “greener” pastures. Such “white flight” is possible across the vast continent of North America but I ask the Maltese; if Africans turn your small island into a Jamaica or a Haiti, where will you go?
Still, my purpose here is not to criticize Africans, but to raise awareness. It’s not the fault of Africans that they have developed differently to us. There's no point denying this fact, or blaming anyone for it, least of all ourselves. And there’s even less point to wrecking advanced nations in a doomed attempt to disprove it! Mr. Lowell is entirely correct when he says that African immigration can only harm Malta. No matter how much cost or social upheaval you undergo to assimilate them, my own experience (and more importantly, all of history) suggests you’ll only succeed in replacing beautiful Malta with another festering Third World hellhole. There’s no coming back from that either, as you can only give away your country once.
So, my friends, I urge you in the strongest possible terms and with the utmost sincerity to reject the degradation of your island by foreigners. Though some may flatter their vanity by patronising these African basket cases, in the end such fools will only undo all the labour and sacrifice of your ancestors, and darken the future of your descendants. Though it is troublesome to contest with your countrymen over this issue, I assure you that it’s infinitely preferable to enduring the crude ways of Africans!
As I hope there will one day be a future for myself and my family in Europe, I can only hope sanity will prevail there. Surely, her nations must realise the peril and turn from their disastrous course? If only more sensible men will follow the example of Norman Lowell, Europe can be saved. Even at this eleventh hour, it is not too late to preserve all that which makes Europe great; her traditions, genius and spirit, and most especially her people, in which all these values reside. It is my dream that the mischief of the lunatic social engineers can be reversed, and Europe remade as the true centre of the civilized world. I wish Mr. Lowell and all of you the very best of fortune in this great and necessary work.
These last few weeks have seen a remarkable turn of events regarding the issue of Ilegal immigration. We first had a standoff between the Maltese and Italian governments regarding who should carry the burden of illegal immigrants who enter Malta's search and rescue area. Next we had the positive step of the Italian government adopting a 'turn them back' policy which Norman Lowell and his movement Imperium Europa have been advocating since the first boats landed.
When asked what it felt like to be proven right in this issue, Norman Lowell responded;
Nothing is more tedious for a writer, or more nauseating for the reader than having to say: “I told you so!” However, I cannot but do otherwise and remind our People that we were the first to ring the tower alarm bells.
We pinpointed the looming problem of Illegal Immigration in 2000. We were denigrated, despised, vilified, arrested, accused of nefarious crimes by a media bent on destroying us. This lynching carries on with unabated malice, but we stood our ground and prevailed. And today the mainstream parties echo our words of years ago, adopt our policies albeit in softer, more nebulous form.
