PDA

View Full Version : Il-Moralità tal-Bocca


malsey
22ndSeptember2005, 12:43
Kull nhar ta sibt il bocca jaghti lezzjonijiet ta tolleranza u human rights(basta lowell u viva malta, ma jkollhomx rights). Safejn naf jiena il bocca hu l avukat ta kumpanija tas sigaretti. Kif ihossu filghaxija qabel jorqod meta jaf li qed jiddefendi kawza li totqol miljuni ta nies!!!



A few cigarettes a day 'deadly'

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40823000/jpg/_40823066_ciggy203.jpg Doctors warn that any amount of smoking is dangerous

Smoking just one to four cigarettes a day almost triples a person's risk of dying of heart disease, according to Norwegian researchers.

Their work suggests the health impact is stronger for women and that even "light" smokers face similar diseases to heavier smokers, including cancer.

The team tracked the health and death rates of almost 43,000 men and women from the mid 1970s up to 2002.

Their findings appear in the journal Tobacco Control.

Lung cancer

Compared with those who had never smoked, the men and women who smoked between one and four cigarettes a day were almost three times as likely to die of coronary artery disease.

Among women, smoking one to four cigarettes daily increased the chance of dying from lung cancer almost five times.

Men who smoked this amount were almost three times as likely to be killed by lung cancer.

However, due to the relatively small number of men that this applied to in the study sample, this finding could have been due to chance.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gifhttp://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif There is no safe level of smoking http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif


Amanda Sandford from ASH



So-called "light" smokers were also found to have a significantly higher risk of dying from any cause - 1.5 times higher generally - than those who had never smoked, when researchers looked at deaths among those studied over the duration of the research.

Death rates from all causes rose as the number of cigarettes smoked every day increased.

Sporadic smoking

The researchers believe their conclusions are accurate, even though they had to estimate the projected impact of smoking one to four cigarettes for five years in those light smokers who had smoked for less time.

This indicated that the risk of death from coronary artery disease for both sexes would have been 7% higher, and the risk of lung cancer would have been 47% higher in women.

A significant proportion of the light smokers had also increased their daily consumption over the period of the study. However, this had not exceeded nine cigarettes a day.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gifhttp://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif The only way to protect smokers from heart disease, cancer and other killer diseases is to quit completely http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif


A spokesman from the British Medical Association



Author Dr Kjell Bjartveit also pointed out that it was not possible to tell from the findings what impact sporadic smoking - such as a few cigarettes on a Saturday night out - might have on health.

Dr Ken Denson of the Thame Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research Foundation questioned the validity of the figures.

He said other large studies had not found that smoking fewer than 10 cigarettes daily increased the risk of heart disease.

'No safe level'

Amanda Sandford from Action on Smoking and Health said the conclusions were clear.

"This study should dispel the myth once and for all that smoking just a few cigarettes a day won't do you any harm.

"Quite simply, there is no safe level of smoking."

A spokesman from the British Medical Association said: "All smokers are putting their health on the line when they smoke - even if they only define themselves as social smokers.

"The only way to protect smokers from heart disease, cancer and other killer diseases is to quit completely."

The Department of Health estimates 106,000 people die every year in the UK as a direct result of smoking. It said quitting was the only way to avoid the serious health risks. Jean King of Cancer Research UK said: "Although more research is needed, this study suggests that the health implications for 'light smokers' are much more serious than previously thought. "This is particularly worrying as a third of smokers in the UK - an estimated 3.7 million people - smoke less than 10 cigarettes a day."

Stanley Laurel
22ndSeptember2005, 12:51
Imma is-sigaretti ////////////////////////... allura dawk tajbin hux!!!

Vulf
22ndSeptember2005, 13:25
Why do we keep taking Beck seriously? He has an agenda, and to a certain extent so do we. But ours is done from heart and mind, his is just a matter of cash. He'll never be on our side, and we will never be on his. End of story. He has his column, we have our website/activists/great minds...

Let him drool...

Kung Fu
22ndSeptember2005, 14:56
mela ma kontux tafu li hafna avukati mandomx kuxjenza? anyway about smoking. its the fault of people who choose to smoke not the suppliers.

Virgil
22ndSeptember2005, 15:18
Jien ma naqbilx mal Mr Beck biss nirrispetta l opinjoni tieghu (ghalkemm hu forsi le)

Ejja nillimitaw l insulti personali u l allegamenti bla provi. Ma jaghmlu unur lil hadd.

umberto
22ndSeptember2005, 22:25
umbad il bocca jitkaza b' 'savage scum'. li ovjament huma. jipretendi li dawn il-parassiti jinvadewna u nghidulhom welcome.

il-verita twegga.

Konti
22ndSeptember2005, 22:30
Biex jiddefendi lil min jidhol illegalment f'pajjizna it-tifel juri li ghandhom problema serja fil-programmazzjoni ta' mohhu!!!:mad:

Cikku
22ndSeptember2005, 22:37
With no offence meant to anybody, let Beck be. He is against us ! So what ?? Is he going to stop us ??

With all due respect, he is a lawyer and his DUTY is to defend his clients. Lawyers defend MURDERERS TOO, but that is their job and DUTY !

So please ignore Beck and all the others !

SILENCE IS GOLDEN !

:rolleyes:

Virgil
23rdSeptember2005, 06:28
Il problema (tikka kritika konstruttiva din) ta vivamalta (u nitfa lili maghkom ukoll) hu li naghtu priorita lix xejn. Tipo l ahhar darba qrajt thread ta xi hadd li hadd qatt mghamel xejn fhajtu (insejt xjismu) vs Imperium u hekk ghedt. Tipo kieku tkellem xi Ministru, xi kap ta kumpanija jew tal anqas xi hadd li jaf xinhi hajja tifhimha. Biss mhux ix xejn. Xjinterresah L IE mil opinjoni tax xejn?

Kung Fu
23rdSeptember2005, 08:19
umbad il bocca jitkaza b' 'savage scum'. li ovjament huma. jipretendi li dawn il-parassiti jinvadewna u nghidulhom welcome.

il-verita twegga.

dak lewwel nies he is full of himself. u dak jikteb hekk biex johloq kontroversja ghax in nies ihobbu jaqraw kontroversja. b'hekk ikun cert li n nies qed jaqraw l-artikli tieghu.

carlos
23rdSeptember2005, 09:05
With no offence meant to anybody, let Beck be. He is against us ! So what ?? Is he going to stop us ??

With all due respect, he is a lawyer and his DUTY is to defend his clients. Lawyers defend MURDERERS TOO, but that is their job and DUTY !

So please ignore Beck and all the others !

SILENCE IS GOLDEN !

:rolleyes:

Cikku, veru li x-xoghol ta' l-avukat hu dak li jiddefendi, imma min ikun it-tip tal-boccu jigifieri imcappas ma certu hnizrijiet(minghajr ma nelabora) missu jkun l-ahhar wiehed li jilaghba tad-dejjaq, tal-fidil u tal-onest! U tal-paladin li jrid jghin lil barrani minghajr ma jghin lil niesu!!

L-istrategija li qed isemmi int ma naqbilx maghha, sintendi nerga nfakkar li jien m'ghandiex rwol f'IE jew rwol ufficjali f'VM.org hlief li nikteb fil-forum, imma nhoss li jkun zball kbir jekk IE jew f'dal kaz VM.org jinjoraw 'nies' bhal Beck li apertament jattakkaw, jikkritikaw u jimminaw l-integrita, l-fama u sa certu estrem l-istabilita ta' kemm IE u VM.org.

Tkun qed issir replika ta' l-istrategija tal-MLP, dhalli lil PN jattakka personalment left, right and centre biex imbaghad jirretaljaw lura b'difiza fjakka li ma twassalhom imkien, ghax tkun qabdithom fuq sieq wahda! Mal-boccu u imbarazz ta' dik l-isfera, l-attakk hu dejjem l-aqwa difiza!