PDA

View Full Version : Central Bank annual report 2004: Malta’s economy expected to grow faster in 2005


PERICLES
13thApril2005, 18:25
Central Bank of Malta annual report 2004: Malta’s economy expected to grow faster in 2005


Malta’s economy is expected to grow at a faster rate this year when compared to the rate of growth achieved last year, according to Central Bank governor Michael Bonello. Even though this is positive, the rate of growth will remain below its potential, he added.

In his statement in the bank’s annual report for 2004, Mr Bonello argued that the country’s economy has been growing at well below its potential rate for several years. This, he said, is characterised by imbalances which are not sustainable in the medium term. He identifies the high fiscal and current account deficits and uncompetitive cost structures as the major obstacles to the attainment of a higher growth rate.

The governor went on to observe that there are many issues which could be attributed to the real reasons behind the country’s minimal economic growth in the last year. He said that European Union membership, the challenges of wider access to export markets and a greater availability of external financial resources are factors which weighed heavily on the performance of the Maltese economy in 2004.

Although real GDP grew by 1.5 per cent, this was lower than the rates achieved by the other new European Union member states.

“The persistence of sluggish growth in the Maltese economy cannot be explained exclusively in terms of a cyclical downturn. There is evidence that the delay in implementing effective competitiveness-enhancing reforms is also an important factor. This, together with the fact that the relationship between productivity and costs has tended to deteriorate compared to that in competitor countries, partly explains why Malta does not appear to be capitalising on the new opportunities to the same extent as most of the new EU member states,” Mr Bonello added.

Another important factor underlying the economy’s poor growth record is the relatively large fiscal deficit, which averaged 6.8 per cent of GDP over the past five years. The governor welcomed the reduction in deficit to 5.2 per cent of GDP in 2004 but emphasised that to realise the government’s plan to narrow the deficit to 1.4 per cent of GDP by 2007, cuts in recurrent expenditure in real terms will be required. This should involve measures aimed at reforming the health and pension systems, reducing the size of the public sector as well as eliminating waste and tax evasion, he said.

Mr Bonello also spoke about the discussions aimed at reaching a compromise on a social pact. He said the “inability of the social partners to reach agreement, however, suggests that there is as yet an insufficient understanding of global economic realities and of the threat they represent for Malta’s small economy,

and more specifically for employment levels”.

The governor warned that in today’s highly competitive environment, there are no painless options which will, at once, produce more rapid growth, enhanced welfare benefits and higher living standards. “The quest for greater competitiveness should, therefore, be pursued as a collective effort and be perceived as being in the mutual interest of all the social partners. Consequently, in the labour market there is need for more flexible work practices and for wage increases to be matched by productivity improvements, while in the area of public health and welfare the extensive range of services and benefits offered should be critically assessed with a view to ensuring their financial sustainability,” he said.

The governor concluded his statement with the reminder that sound public finances and macroeconomic fundamentals are critical to the role played by the bank in the economy, as excessive fiscal deficits and uncompetitive cost structures thwart the attainment of price stability.

Failure to undertake the necessary fiscal and supply-side adjustments would, therefore, require a tighter monetary policy stance. Sustainable and coherent fiscal and monetary policies, moreover, also impinge crucially on the medium-term objective of adopting the euro. The prospect of securing the benefits of full participation in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) should in the governor’s view, therefore, serve to motivate a common effort in support of policies aimed at ensuring a rapid and smooth transition to the euro.

The bank’s net operating profits in 2004 amounted to Lm14.9 million as against Lm18.2 million the previous year. The report attributes the decline to lower income on the bank’s external reserve portfolio.



http://217.145.4.56/ind/news.asp?newsitemid=14316

Freedom
13thApril2005, 18:30
Haha the yearly lie.

PERICLES
13thApril2005, 18:35
Haha the yearly lie.

I will comment only at the end of the year. I don't trust predictions too much. We all know what happened with the prediction of 2003 were the deficits ended up millions higher than expected. :eek: :eek: :eek:

Freedom
13thApril2005, 18:46
The result is the other yearly lie.
Why should our rulers say the deficit has decreased?
What excuses are they gonna bring for the increase in taxes and cost of living then?

PERICLES
13thApril2005, 18:58
Why should our rulers say the deficit has decreased?

1) First of all leaders not rulers.

2)Why they should say that the deficit decreased? Hmmm......maybe because it did? :cool:

Marco Polo
13thApril2005, 22:34
The result is the other yearly lie.
Why should our rulers say the deficit has decreased?
What excuses are they gonna bring for the increase in taxes and cost of living then?

You are 100% right.

1) First of all leaders not rulers.

2)Why they should say that the deficit decreased? Hmmm......maybe because it did? :cool:

1)Are you sure they are leaders? seem like rulers to me.

2)Because they are politicians and it's their job to lie?

seriously though, could be so people open up their purses a little more, i dont know. The business people i speak to say things are worse.

PERICLES
13thApril2005, 22:41
1)Are you sure they are leaders? seem like rulers to me.

2)Because they are politicians and it's their job to lie?

seriously though, could be so people open up their purses a little more, i dont know. The business people i speak to say things are worse.

1) I know that some of our are not fully respected however we cannot say that we are living under a Mugabe style regime. :)

2) If the business people are telling you that they have less money it means that the government is not lying. The Government's current policy is to tax people to increase its revenue to reduce the deficit. In this scenario less money in the pockets of the people would mean more money in the Government's coffers.

In my opinion the Government should now start concentrating on reducing the expenditure because it simply cannot keep on taxing people.

malsey
13thApril2005, 22:48
Purely Bullshit, they are lying. Everybody knows our economy will never recover under gonzi!!!
Next year will be even worse, since there would be an other increase income tax. The best people and most paid in the country are leaving, therefore less taxes will be paid.

Marco Polo
13thApril2005, 23:13
Business people are telling me that customers are spending less and not that they have less money! If people are spending less how can the economy grow? How can people spend more money if the governement is taking their disposable income away through higher taxes?

Lies, lies, lies!

Florian Geyer
13thApril2005, 23:24
Business people are telling me that customers are spending less and not that they have less money! If people are spending less how can the economy grow? How can people spend more money if the governement is taking their disposable income away through higher taxes?

Lies, lies, lies!

My boss has never got any money.Company expenditure gets bigger and bigger every year.Its' never stopped him from trying to take over Malta.

Maybe my boss is an .......OLIGARCH and I don't know it.Myself, I spend dosh like it's going out of fashion.Don't worry folks, I'll keep the economy going.:D

Freedom
14thApril2005, 01:48
1) I know that some of our are not fully respected however we cannot say that we are living under a Mugabe style regime. :)
Spot one difference (except skin colour).

If the business people are telling you that they have less money it means that the government is not lying. The Government's current policy is to tax people to increase its revenue to reduce the deficit
You previously said that the deficit is increasing. So either your previous assertion is false or the government's policy is false.

In this scenario less money in the pockets of the people would mean more money in the Government's coffers
As far as I know we are not living in a communist state. You are excluding private enterpreneurs.
Less money in people's pockets means less money in business's pockets which means more unemployment and a furthet less money in people's pockets resulting in total chaos in which the goverment's coffers are also affected. Everything is interdependent.

etoile noir
14thApril2005, 08:53
how did pericles become Περικλής ?

PERICLES
14thApril2005, 12:13
Spot one difference (except skin colour).


Hmmm......European leaders do not starve to death thier political opposers.



You previously said that the deficit is increasing. So either your previous assertion is false or the government's policy is false.

I was referring to the 2003 deficit, the one of the "finanzi fis-sod" (which rose from the previous year). The 2004 deficit was the one which decreased.


As far as I know we are not living in a communist state. You are excluding private enterpreneur.

Less money in people's pockets means less money in business's pockets which means more unemployment and a furthet less money in people's pockets resulting in total chaos in which the goverment's coffers are also affected. Everything is interdependent.

True everything is interdependent, however presently in Malta people are having less money to spend not because of the inflation but because the Government is taxing more. Its obvious that the taxes that we are paying ARE NOT ending up in businessmen's pockets but in the Government coffers. Are you objecting to this statement. Its true that a part of that money will end up to private contructors however it has to pass through the Government first.

Cikku
14thApril2005, 13:09
The governor warned that in today’s highly competitive environment, there are no painless options which will, at once, produce more rapid growth, enhanced welfare benefits and higher living standards. “The quest for greater competitiveness should, therefore, be pursued as a collective effort and be perceived as being in the mutual interest of all the social partners. Consequently, in the labour market there is need for more flexible work practices and for wage increases to be matched by productivity improvements, while in the area of public health and welfare the extensive range of services and benefits offered should be critically assessed with a view to ensuring their financial sustainability,” he said.

In this equation is my dear friend Mike Bonello INCLUDING ALL, i.e from the President of Malta down ?? You have to start at the TOP to make any substantial cuts.



2) If the business people are telling you that they have less money it means that the government is not lying. The Government's current policy is to tax people to increase its revenue to reduce the deficit. In this scenario less money in the pockets of the people would mean more money in the Government's coffers. - Originally Posted by PERICLES

"Less money in the pockets of the people would NOT mean more money in the Government's coffers," on the contrary, it would mean LESS money in the Government's coffers. If people have no money, they DON'T and CANNOT spend and therefore they will not leave money at business outlets and these business outlets cannot keep their staff and start sacking people and so on -- a very vicious circle.

My boss has never got any money.Company expenditure gets bigger and bigger every year.Its' never stopped him from trying to take over Malta. - Originally Posted by Florian Geyer

I don't know your boss but having been in business for a few decades I can tell you that THAT is the truth. He never has any money because his costs are always on the increase, (taxes, social security contributions, licenses, services and fees etc) his profits are on the decrease his turnover is probably a pittance compared to previous years and you do not have to be an Einstein to predict the outcome.




True everything is interdependent, however presently in Malta people are having less money to spend not because of the inflation but because the Government is taxing more. Its obvious that the taxes that we are paying ARE NOT ending up in businessmen's pockets but in the Government coffers. Are you objecting to this statement. Its true that a part of that money will end up to private contructors however it has to pass through the Government first.- Originally Posted by PERICLES

As far as I know taxes NEVER went through businessmen's pockets but the other way round. The businessman makes money (or so the theory goes) and then he pays taxes to support the extravgancies of the "leaders" or "rulers" or whatever.